美國經(jīng)濟分析局的簡報-更好地測量創(chuàng)新和無形資產(chǎn)【外文翻譯】

1、原文：BEA BRIEFINGToward Better Measurement of Innovation and IntangiblesBy Ana M. Aizcorbe, Carol E. Moylan, and Carol A. RobbinsWhile all countries account for investment intangible assets in their gross domestic product (GDP) statistics, no country currently includes a comprehensive estimate of busi

2、nessinvestment in intangible assetsin their official accounts. Most economists agree, however, that intangible assets which represent an important input into the innovative process are critical components of the modern economy. In the United States, some have suggested that investment in intangible

3、assets now roughly equals investment in tangible assets.Understanding the role of intangible assets and thus the role of innovative activity in general is critical to understanding the modern economy. This article updates the ongoing efforts at the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) to better measure

4、 investment in various intangible assets.BEA has a history of continuously improving its GDP statistics to account for major shifts in the economy (chart 1). Indeed, some intangible investments are already included in the GDP accounts. Expenditures on software, for example, have been treated as inve

5、stment in the core accounts since 1999. And in 2006, BEA launched a research and development (R&D) satellite account, to explore investment in R&D and its larger economic effects.BEA is currently exploring the feasibility of creating satellite accounts that would report investment in a varie

6、ty of other intangible assets.Although there are thorny conceptual issues to consider, the binding constraint on progress remains measurement, which is extremely difficult because of the paucity of source data and lack of firm evidence supporting the assumptions required for measurement.A satellite

7、account refers to a set of accounts that allows for experimental measurementin a framework consistent with GDP but separate from the official accounts. Satellite accounts typically allow for a more detailed look at specific parts of the economy, measuresbased on new methodologies and source data, an

8、d new estimation approaches. The R&D satellite account, for example, provided a means of exploring the impact of capitalizing R&D spending on GDP growth and a framework through which various methodological and conceptual issues can be worked out.As of now, BEA s main efforts to measure innov

9、ative activity have focused on its R&D account, which was produced in partnership with the National Science Foundation (NSF). The most recent version of the R&D account, releasedin 2007, provides statistics for 1959-2004 on R&D investment and the impact of treating R&D as investment

10、on GDP statistics and other aggregates. The account was also expanded to include detail about the effects on BEA sindustry, regional, and international accounts. In the satellite account where R&D is properly treated as investment, investments in R&D contribute approximately 0.2 percentage p

11、oint to the 3.3 percent growth rate of GDP in 1995 W004!Although budget reductions prevented the provision of updated statistics in 2008, BEA has continued the necessary research to incorporate R&D investment into core GDP accounts in 2013. Methodological issues still remain. Estimates of real i

12、nvestment in R&D require the use of a deflator, and there is not yet a consensus on how to construct this deflator. BEA is conducting research and hopes to work with the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) on this issue in the future; BEA is also exploring improved measures of depreciation for the

13、R&D stock.In addition to R&D, investment in artistic originals mainly motion picture and sound recordings is scheduled to be incorporated into the GDP accounts in 2013.Currently, there are no plans to include investment in any other types of intangible assets in the core accounts. However, B

14、EA will continue to work with the NSF in its efforts to expand the NSF survey beyond technological innovation and R&D and to explore the potential impact on macroeconomic aggregatesof treating these other asset classes as investment. Beyond properly accounting for firms investments in intangible

15、 assets the subject of this article BEA is also exploring measures of individuals investments in human capiatanlother type of intangible asset. (See thebox“ Measuring Human Capital.The rest of this article discusses the following:The conceptual issues surrounding the measurement of innovation and fi

16、rms investments in intangible assets.The logic underlying the national accounting methods used to measure investment.The different types of intangible assets considered in the literature, including technological and nontechnological innovative assets.The existing data available for measurement and o

17、ther measurement challenges.Details on BEA s plansInnovation and Economic GrowthInnovation has long been recognized as an important driver of economic growth.For example, the invention of the transistor over 50 years ago gave rise to wave after wave of new goods that have transformed the economy. En

18、tirely new products, like the semiconductor, and new ways of approaching markets, like the Internet, are examples of the fruits of innovative activities that followed from the development of the transistor.The notion of “ innovation c”an be elusive, as seen in the widely different definitions that e

19、conomists, policy analysts, and business leaders frequently use (see the box “ What Is Innovation? ” on page 14). Common to these definitions, however, is the realization of commercial value in the market place from the creation of something that did not previously exist. In January of last year, th

20、e Commerce stDepartment Asdvisory Committee on Measuring Innovation in the 21 Century Economy published a report Innovation Measurement: Tracking the State of Innovation in the American Economy that included a definition consistent with the above notion:The design, invention, development and/or impl

21、ementation of new or altered products, services, processes, systems,organizational structures, or business models for the purpose of creating new value for customers and financial returns for the firm.While this view of innovation recognizes the importance of both technological and nontechnological

22、innovation, until recently, economic studies on innovation were primarily focused on technological innovation. Examples of this focus include studying the transformation of R&D expenditures into patents and the diffusion of technology across the economy through the adoption of new products or pr

23、ocesses, such as a new hybrid seed stock or a new generation of information technology equipment. The emphasis has only recently begun shifting to include the role of new products, processes, and business models in the increasingly important and growing service sector of the economy.The microeconomi

24、c literature has not given rise to a paradigm that lends itself to measuring innovation and its impact on economic growth. Modeling these activities at a microlevel is difficult, in part because the process of innovation involves a complex set of economic actors and interactions that in principle re

25、quire that one take account of networks, linkages, and complementarities. For example, Stephen Kline and Nathan Rosenberg (1986) have argued that a linear model in which research expenditures lead to product development and then commercialization is not an accurate model for the innovation process;

26、this narrow focus on the formal research process misses the feedback between innovators, their competitors, and their customers. A more fundamental problem is that traditional microeconomic theory and measurementare often based on the presumption that change is incremental, while innovation by its n

27、ature creates not only incremental improvements but also completely new products, processes and markets.In contrast, macroeconomists and national accountants take a more stylized view of the economy and use a “ residualme” thod to understand the overall contribution of innovation to economic growth.

28、 As Robert Solow (1957) noted, most of the growth in gross national product could not be explained by growth in conventional inputs, such as (tangible) capital and labor. He attributed most of the unexplained residual in economic growth to “ advances in knowledge. ” This observation helped fuel over

29、 40 years of conceptual and empirical research into the sources of economic growth. Researchers such as Denison (1962) and Jorgenson and Griliches (1967) built growth accounting models that provided a conceptual and accounting framework for explaining the sources of growth with a special emphasis on

30、 accounting for the unexplained residual, also called multifactor productivity (chart 2). Using this metric, less than half of the growth in the economy today can be attributed to growth of the traditional inputs, labor and capital. The residual can also be attributed to mismeasurement of labor and

31、capital inputs and to the effects of any spillovers benefits of innovative activity above what an economic entity has paid for; because they are not paid for directly, spillovers lie outside the scope of firm-supplied inputs to production and will be captured in the residual.Much of the recent work

32、by macroeconomists in this area has concentrated on identifying and measuring inputs other than tangible capital and labor that are related to innovation and can contribute significantly to growth. In particular, one focus has been on investments in intangible assets. A paper by Leonard Nakamura (19

33、99) and a series of papers by Corrado, Hulten, and Sichel (2004, 2006) has shown that under a plausible set of assumptions, the measured contribution of intangible assets to economic growth could be substantial. Their results for the United States have been replicated for other countries, and there

34、is now a growing consensus on the importance of these assets in accounting for economic growth.Summing up, the innovation process leads to the creation of economically useful knowledge that exists separately from either people or tangibles, such as equipment or structures. This economically useful k

35、nowledge is an intangible that is an output of a productive process as well as an input into the creation of new output. By identifying measures of this knowledge, measuring them using national accounting, and incorporating them into a growth-accounting framework, one can begin to develop a comprehe

36、nsive set of statistics to better understand innovation as a driver of economic growth.Measuring Intangibles in the National Accounts.As demonstrated by Corrado, Hulten, and Sichel, accounting for intangible assets in the national accounts and in the Solow growth calculation can be done using the sa

37、me method that is currently used for tangible assets.That method is summarized in this section.Essentially, treating spending on intangibles as investment would have two primary effects on the national income and product accounts: it would increase GDP and gross domestic income (GDI) in periods when

38、 firms invest in intangibles. It would also add a new input intangible capital or “ thestock of knowledge ” and the value of the capital services generated by that capital would be measured in the income account in subsequent periods.Table 1 shows the consolidated income and product accounts for the

39、 United States: the right, or “ product, ” side of this account shows the total final output produced in the nation organized by type of expenditure, and the left, or“ income, ” side shows theincomes earned and other costs incurred in production.The summary measureof production on the right side GDP

40、 is defined as the market value of final goods and services produced by labor and property within the United States during a given period. The product entries show the approach used by BEA to derive GDP: it is measured as the sum of purchases by final users and includes the familiar spending categor

41、ies of consumption, investment (including inventories), and net trade.Gross private domestic investment includes purchases of fixed assets (equipment, software, and structures) by private businessesand nonprofit institutions serving households that contribute to production and have a useful life of

42、more than 1 year. It also includes construction of housing for households and private business investment in inventories. Importantly, intermediate inputs, which are entirely used in the production process in one period and do not contribute to future production, are not included in investment.On th

43、e left is the sum of all the incomes earned and costs incurred in production. Specifically, the left side shows GDI as the sum of the income earned by labor (compensation of employees), by governments (taxes on production and imports less subsidies), and by entrepreneurs (net operating surplus, whic

44、h is a profits-like measure for private and government enterprises), and the consumption of fixed capital (the using up of capital).To trace through how investment is recorded in the accounts, suppose a firm purchases a new productive asset that was created in the same period. This purchase affects

45、the national accounts both in the period when it is purchased and in subsequent periods as the asset provides services to the firm. Because the asset is a final good, its value is recorded as investment and adds to GDP in the period that the asset is produced. The value of the asset may be thought o

46、f as the expected discounted present value of the stream of benefits it will provide into the future. Offsetting this entry, the costs of producing the asse t payments to factors of production are recorded on the income side of the account. Once purchased, the asset becomes an input to the productio

47、n process, and the flow of services to the production of other goods and services from the assetin each period of its service life is recorded in the income account. This flow of services may be thought of as the amount that producers would be willing to pay to rent the asset for a given period. In

48、principle, the sum of all the rental payments would equal the value and, hence, the price of the asset.In practice, national accountants use the notion of a capital stock to deal with the intertemproral nature of these capital assets. The perpetual inventory method is used to construct capital stock

49、s that track the value of assets in an asset account separate from the GDP accounts. In the fixed assetsaccounts, investments are added to the capital stock in the period when they are made, and depreciation is used to measure reductions in the capital stock. The value of capital services the value

50、of the assets use in production, similar to the rental payments described above is defined as the sum of depreciation and the net return on investment. Depreciation (or consumption of fixed capital) provides a measure of how much of the asset is “ usedup” in production. This per period value reflect

51、s an amount that would need to be set aside to eventually replace the asset as it is used up in the production process. The net return on investment recognizes that the asset contributes to the profitability of the company. In the business sector, net returns are assumed to be included implicitly in

52、 the measure of net operating surplus in the income account.In the Solow (1957) growth model, recognizing these intangibles as investment would increase the value of output real GDP and of inputs the value of services from the new input. While this, in principle, could increaseor decreasethe Solow r

53、esidual, empirical studies typically show reductions in the size of the residual when the treatment of intangible inputs is changed from an intermediate good to an investment good.The construction of these national accounting measures requires data on nominal spending to measure investment, price de

54、flators to translate nominal investment into real quantities, and several parameters for the construction of the capital stocks and services from that stock, notably depreciation rates.Identifying and Measuring Nominal Spending on IntangiblesThis section discussesthe broad classes of spending that h

55、ave been considered intangible assets in previous studies with a focus on two major issues. The first issue concerns the types of spending that can be considered investment. This issue hinges on the length of assets service lives; goods that are treated as investment goods in the national accounts t

56、ypically have services lives longer than 1 year. The second issue concerns the data available to construct these measures, an importantissue because existing studies suggest that the choice of which spending to treat as investment is often guided by data availability and quality issues rather than b

57、y conceptual issues about which types of spending constitute investment.Table 2 provides a list of spending classes that Corrado, Hulten, and Sichel (2004, 2006) explored and their estimates of these expenditures.Computerized informationInformation contained in software and databasesis a significant

58、 knowledge asset that can be an important contributor to the innovation process and thus economic growth. Expenditures for these types of intangible assetsare perhaps the easiest to measure, and indeed many of these expenditures are already treated as investment in GDP.Notably, BEA has treated busin

59、ess and government expenditures for computer software as investment since 1999. The relative accessibility of data sources for computerized information allows a fairly detailed and comprehensive estimate for nominal investment in software. Purchases of software by businesses and government, either prepackaged or custom, are derived by first forming estimates of domestic absorption of software and then removing software purchases by households, softwareembedded in computer equipment, and changes in inventories.The source data for these calculations i